Beauty Products – Thoughts on Packaging and Labeling

Leading names in the natural and organic cosmetics market gathered in New York earlier this month for the Natural Beauty Summit. Needless to say, the potential of the Indian cosmetics market was also a topic of discussion. According to Karen Daskow, from market reasearch group Kline, overall growth in the Indian market is surpassing the global average.

This is matched by Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) which predicts that the cosmetics market will grow from $950m to $1.4bn in the next 2-3 years, which would bring India’s per capita expenditure up to that of China’s.

Just imagine the total number of soaps, creams, shampoos and countless other products that are entering the consumption steam of the average Indian.

  • From a company’s point of view, this is great news. More consumption, more sales, higher economies of scale leading to greater profits.
  • From a consumer perspective, this is great news too. As it talks of a growing prosperity and disposable income.
  • From a society perspective – we face a dual challenge. The challenge of disposing off used products packs and the challenge of information dissemination.

Product Packaging and Labeling
Beautiful multicolored bottles, jars and tubes are all part of the buying experience when it comes to cosmetics.  Product packaging  is an essential part of the marketing mix that not only makes the product looked good but helps us in making the right choice as a consumer.

Let’s take the case of my Garnier and Ponds moisturisers.

  • Layer 1 – On the outermost layer is a plastic film that covers a cardboard box. The film is of course protective in nature and is the first thing to be discarded by the consumer.
  • Layer 2 – This contains the cardboard box. The cardboard  is printed all the way round on the sides as well as the top and bottom. These boxes adhere to the labeling standards that have been outlined  in statutory regulations. In addition, they  also have the important task of maintaining the brand identity with logos colour and font sizes.
  • Layer 3 – This contains the glass jar with a plastic lid. Both glass jars look pretty and can take place of pride on a dressing table.
  • Layer 4 – My ponds box has another component, a flyer (same as the website) that details out the entire product range – Ponds Age Miracle.

Lets look at all the 4 layers from 2 perspectives,

Does it add to product appeal?
Does it add to usability?

Product Packaging

Product Appeal

  • The pretty red Ponds box does look larger and more appealing than the Garnier when I walked down the aisles in a couple of stores.
  • The Ponds jar too looks prettier on my table when I compare it to the Garnier.

Usability

  • When I look closer the Ponds box is 30% larger in volume but has only 10 ml more cream. So do we really need such a large box, and so much paper? A typical marketer might add that product purchase is 80% impulse in the retail environment. So appeal matters. I don’t have any counter arguments to that, my only complaint with the packaging seems to be the apparent waste. To house a jar of 40 or 50 ml cream, how much paper and plastic are we wasting? Is it really needed?
  • From the point of view of reading the matter on the product labels, I have to admit that the Ponds pack is too shiny and the tiny white font on the gray really makes it impossible to read. The communication is also in 3 languages – How many Indians understand Thai? It is obviously a product for a larger international market. But, given that we are in India and comparing usability for an Indian customer, I have to admit that the Ponds labeling really needs more work. The Garnier labeling is clean and simple and very readable. Though local languages need to be considered too.
  • Now, lets look at the ingredients. Does Methoxycinnamate make any sense to you? or have you ever heard of Titanium Dioxide? If you have been reading cosmetics sites you might have heard of these, where there are various debates on the use of chemicals in cosmetics, harmful impacts, benefits, etc. My issue with the ingredients list on both products is that, it is impossible to decipher.

In beauty products, many will tell you that packaging and labeling is half the battle. But are manufacturers missing out on something a bit more essential. Could packaging and labeling design be improved? Can we design for function and then impact?

I have a few suggestions:

Design for usability – The new consumer wants more information. Don’t just pander to this need by giving a sales pitch, give genuine insight so that customers believe you.
Waste not – All company websites talk of sustainability. Doesn’t wasteful packaging contradict the core ethos of the company? So, get more with least waste.
Use technology
Web – Why should websites not have detailed product information? In todays age do we really have any excuse? In addition, can the web be used as a channel of engagement rather than a TV replacement?
Cell phone use is the highest in India. Can we not make better use of this? A simple application would be for cosmetic manufacturers to pool in together and created an integrated ingredients database. Customers can send an SMS and get information they seek. (More on this in a subsequent post)

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recent

  • Sustainability Sits Best under Marketing in Many Cases

    A company’s sustainability strategy is best delivered through the marketing department, according to Unilever’s new chief marketing and communications officer ...more
  • The Gender Equation in CSR

    I just read this post on Gender Bias in CSR . After reading the ...more
  • Integrated Reporting – Opportunities and Challenges for CEO’s / CFO’s of Indian Companies

    In business school we were taught ʻHow to read a balance sheetʼ. Many hours were spent coming to terms with ...more
  • On Mentors..

    In a world where everyone is seeking smart people , experts and lists, the real lessons that one learns are ...more
  • FaceBorg. You will be Resisted.

    In the world that the leader of Faceborg lives in, he thinks of Faceborg as a country on the planet. His ambitions include making Faceborg the center of this planet or maybe replace the name of all people, countries and even the planet. Welcome he says because resistance is futile. It is interesting that Faceborg thinks of itself as  a country. The country is not a democracy and infact they do not hold free and fair elections to anything. They just decide and rule and then change their mind and make new rules. To rule. In this assimilated world there is only one option you have only one place to turn to. Faceborg and the option to Like. Faceborg thinks of inhabitants as objects. Objects to be manipulated and mashed and shared with other participants such as the builders who make newer applications that manipulate them. They have forgotten that these are not objects but real people who need to be treated with respect. In reality, Faceborg is just a company with some customers. A company that has mistakenly thought of its customers as objects. It thinks that its real customers are developers, advertisers etc. The mistake it is repeatedly making is that it is ignoring the people who have made this company. The Faceborg of the past and the company of today are two different things. The people who signed up for it made the mistake of not understanding the ambitions of this company or were perhaps the company has diverged from its original path. If there is one thing that the history of this planet tells us, mistakes are often corrected, belatedly sometimes . If Faceborg had their way, they would assimilate but there are enough people who feel that assimilation is futile. We are people who will find a better alternatives away from the greed and ambition of Faceborg. If you are concerned about your Faceborg account think about this and join the resistance. If you want to leave this Faceborg, why is there just a deactivation and why not a complete deletion. Why are they profiting from your individuality even after you have stopped the service? If there is a problem, do you know of any easy way of contacting anyone in Faceborg. There have been many problems people have faced. Have they got a satisfactory response? What is the safety and support net Why is it not possible to see who of these unknown third parties access your information and to what end they use it? Should a company have access to so much data just because they can. What are the checks and measures that various countries are going to build so that their citizens are safe from the predatory practices of Faceborg? Assimilation is Futile. What are your thoughts on Facebook? more

Related


Comments

  • Thanks Fabian for the comment.You are right, there is a need to put in sustainability related checks and measures into ...more
  • Hi Namrata. Thanks for this very interesting insight. I agree with you on the importance of marketing for sustainability. I also think that the marketing function has a very important role to play ...more
  • (There was a similar conversation going on about gender with regards to CSR somewhere else quite recently, so I apologize if I'm cross-posting.)As a man working in CSR, I get the ...more
  • The stereotypes are just that: statistically significant behavioural patterns that are broadly applicable to populations. That is why they rile people. But the people who are leading CSR efforts in ...more
  • Great thoughts on mentoring Syamant - I wrote a post titled "8 Lessons I Learned on Being ...more

Quick Notes